“I Spit on It”: Uloma Breaks Silence on Ezra Olubi’s Resurfaced Tweets, Calls for Accountability

In a dramatic turn that has captured the attention of social media and wider public discourse, Uloma, a close friend of tech entrepreneur Ezra Olubi, has issued a forceful statement in response to resurfaced tweets from Olubi that many have described as dark and disturbing. Uloma’s message, shared via Twitter, leaves no room for ambiguity, rejecting any attempt to excuse or defend the content and calling for accountability above all else.

“I do not excuse or defend what I read. I spit on it,” Uloma declared, her words resonating as a stark moral stance in a digital landscape where loyalty and friendship are often tested against principles and public pressure. The tweets in question, originating years ago, have resurfaced and sparked renewed debate over behavior, ethics, and responsibility in the tech industry and beyond. For many, the resurfaced content serves as a reminder that actions, words, and the culture one perpetuates online have consequences, sometimes years after the fact.

Uloma did not mince words in describing the emotional weight of confronting the messages. She explained that seeing the tweets was deeply unsettling, noting that they made her “mouth bitter” and her “belly ache.” Such vivid expressions capture the personal and moral discomfort experienced by those who feel compelled to respond to behavior they find unacceptable, even when it involves a friend. In her statement, Uloma emphasizes that her response is rooted in principle rather than personal animosity, framing the issue not as a question of friendship or loyalty but as one of ethics and societal responsibility.

Throughout her response, Uloma underscores a fundamental belief: no personal connection, history, or sentiment can outweigh core principles. “This period has also been a reminder for me: no friendship, no history, no sentiment outweighs my principles,” she wrote. This declaration positions accountability and moral clarity as higher priorities than private loyalties or social alliances, a stance that resonates in a society grappling with the intersections of personal relationships and public responsibility.

Uloma further stresses her long-standing opposition to harmful cultural norms and behaviors, particularly those related to what she describes as “ra culture-in words, in behaviour, in the excuses people make for it.” Her statement indicates a consistency in her values, highlighting that her commitment to creating safer communities has not wavered despite the involvement of a close associate. The statement reflects a broader call for vigilance, encouraging individuals not to tolerate or normalize harmful behavior, regardless of its source.

The timing of Uloma’s statement coincides with a broader reckoning in tech and social media circles over accountability, ethics, and the influence of digital culture. As tweets and other digital content can resurface years later, the need for ethical consistency and principled stances becomes paramount. Uloma’s insistence on addressing the issue head-on, without deflection or rationalization, offers a model for handling situations in which personal connections intersect with professional and moral responsibilities. Her approach contrasts with those who might attempt to downplay or ignore problematic behavior, reflecting a growing expectation for transparency and accountability in both online and offline spaces.

Beyond the immediate context of Olubi’s resurfaced tweets, Uloma’s declaration carries broader implications for societal norms and public discourse. By explicitly rejecting alignment with harmful behavior, she reinforces the idea that values should guide actions and responses, even when doing so challenges social pressures or personal loyalties. In a world where silence or defensiveness often serves as a protective mechanism, Uloma’s decision to prioritize honesty and accountability sends a strong message: ethical integrity is non-negotiable.

In her statement, Uloma also touches on the theme of growth and the role of accountability in personal and societal development. “I will always choose accountability, honesty and growth over silence or defensiveness,” she asserts. This perspective frames accountability not as a punitive measure but as an opportunity for reflection, education, and transformation. It underscores the importance of confronting uncomfortable truths, learning from them, and using one’s platform to prevent harm rather than shield or excuse it.

Uloma’s words have sparked conversations across social media, eliciting a spectrum of responses from support to debate. Many commend her courage and moral clarity, noting that her willingness to confront difficult realities—even when they involve close friends—sets a high standard for integrity. Others, however, grapple with the tension between personal loyalty and public accountability, highlighting the challenges that arise when digital legacies intersect with human relationships. The discourse reflects an ongoing societal negotiation over the boundaries of forgiveness, responsibility, and ethical action in the age of social media.

The broader tech and entrepreneurial communities are also watching closely, as Olubi’s situation underscores the responsibility leaders bear not only in their professional actions but in the personal conduct that becomes part of the public record. The incident is a reminder that digital footprints, even those from years past, carry weight and that public figures must navigate their histories with awareness and responsibility. Uloma’s statement serves as both a critique and a guidepost, demonstrating how principled responses can uphold standards of decency and accountability while fostering a culture of ethical behavior.

Ultimately, Uloma’s response is a bold affirmation of values over convenience, ethics over sentiment, and accountability over silence. Her words—“I do not align myself with it. I abhor it, I spit on it, I forbid it”—resonate as a moral compass in times of controversy, reminding us that integrity requires both courage and consistency. In confronting the resurfaced tweets, Uloma not only addresses a specific instance of troubling behavior but also articulates a broader stance on responsibility, morality, and the role of individuals in shaping safer, more accountable communities.

As the conversation continues, Uloma’s declaration may serve as a reference point for those navigating similar challenges, whether in personal relationships, professional environments, or the public sphere. Her unwavering commitment to principles, even when tested by friendship or social pressure, exemplifies the power of voice in advocating for justice and accountability. It is a stark reminder that while history, loyalty, and sentiment are important, they cannot override the imperative to confront wrongdoing and stand firmly on the side of ethical action.

In a moment defined by the resurfacing of past misdeeds and the scrutiny of digital behavior, Uloma’s words stand out not only for their clarity and conviction but also for their insistence on moral responsibility. They are a declaration that integrity is not situational, that friendship does not excuse harm, and that accountability is a non-negotiable component of building safer, more ethical communities. Her stance, uncompromising and unwavering, challenges all of us to consider how we respond when confronted with the dark, disturbing, or unacceptable—and whether we, too, are willing to choose principle over convenience.

Uloma’s public reaction to Ezra Olubi’s resurfaced tweets is more than a personal statement; it is a call to action. It compels individuals and communities alike to examine their own stances on accountability, to reject harmful behavior, and to uphold the values that sustain trust, safety, and integrity. In a digital age where words carry enduring consequences, her voice is both a warning and an inspiration: speak truth, defend ethics, and never compromise your principles.